Thomas said courts can “use analogies to those historical regulations of ‘sensitive places’ to determine that modern regulations prohibiting the carry of firearms in new and analogous sensitive places are constitutionally permissible. Thomas said that the historical record shows legislative assemblies, polling places and courthouses could also be sensitive places. The justices also suggested that states can prohibit the carrying of guns altogether in certain “sensitive places.” A previous Supreme Court decision mentioned schools and government buildings as being places where guns could be off limits. The decision also said nothing “about the kinds of weapons that people may possess,” Alito noted, so states might also try to limit the availability of specific weapons. Justice Samuel Alito noted that the decision said “nothing about who may lawfully possess a firearm or the requirements that must be met to buy a gun.” States have long prohibited felons and the mentally ill from possessing weapons, for example. States can also say those with a license to carry a gun must not do so openly but must conceal their weapon. States can still require people to get a license to carry a gun, Kavanaugh wrote, and condition that license on “fingerprinting, a background check, a mental health records check, and training in firearms handling and in laws regarding the use of force, among other possible requirements.” Gun control groups said states could revisit and perhaps increase those requirements. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, noted the limits of the decision. WHAT CAN STATES DO TO REGULATE GUNS AFTER THE DECISION? Connecticut and Delaware are also sometimes mentioned as states with similar laws. The Biden administration has counted California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island as all having laws similar to New York’s. WHAT OTHER STATES ARE LIKELY TO BE IMPACTED?Ī handful of states have laws similar to New York’s. In addition, the decision does not address the law that recently passed in New York in response to the Buffalo grocery store massacre that among things, banned anyone under age 21 from buying or possessing a semi-automatic rifle. The state might also prohibit handguns from being carried in certain places, like near schools or on public transit. Some options under discussion include requiring firearms training and a clean criminal record. Supreme Court on Thursday effectively ended race-conscious admission programs. The decision also doesn’t take effect immediately and state lawmakers said Thursday that they were planning to overhaul the licensing rules this summer. Supreme Court guts affirmative action, effectively ending race-conscious admissions. In the future, however, New Yorkers will no longer be required to give a specific reason why they want to be able to carry a gun in public. The court made it clear that the state can continue to make people apply for a license to carry a handgun, and can put limitations on who qualifies for a permit and where a weapon can be carried. The justices didn’t touch other parts of New York’s gun law, so other requirements to get a license remain. ARE NEW YORKERS NOW FREE TO CARRY A GUN IN PUBLIC?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |